Jurnal Transformative
Volume 10, Issue 1, March 2024, Pages 21-41
Full Lenght Article
Urban Area Policy Innovation From The Perspective of Public Policy in Serang Municipality, Indonesia
Received 27 February 2024, Published 31 March 2024, Available online 31 March 2024.
Under a Creative Commons license
Open Access
Abstract
This article aims to discuss the policy implications and criteria for ideal urban area policy innovation from a public policy perspective. This research was conducted using a case study approach using semi-structured interview data collection techniques as a data collection instrument. The results of the research show that the policy implications for urban residential areas in Serang City are still not optimal due to the limited authority of the city government and the lack of integration of SiKasep policy innovations with urban needs and problems. Apart from that, SiKasep policy innovations have not been able to have an impact due to the low ability and willingness to innovate within the civil service. country. The policy innovation criteria for ideal urban residential areas in Serang City can be applied through the New Public Services (NPS) approach as a representation of policy innovation. Research findings show the importance of strengthening regulations and legitimacy, especially in formulating programs and policies for urban residential areas that are based on regional policy standards; second, the importance of encouraging policy interventions related to access to basic services for the community; third, it is important to encourage policy actors to develop integrated programs and minimize the various interests that hinder policy innovation in urban residential areas; and fourth, participation and involvement of non-governmental elements is very important to obtain broader policy support.
Keywords
Policy Innovation
Serang Municipality
Urban Area
Declarations
Publisher's Note
Faculty of Social and Political Science Universitas Brawijaya remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
Afewerki, S., Osmundsen, T., Olsen, M. S., Størkersen, K., Misund, A., & Thorvaldsen, T. (2023). Innovation policy in the Norwegian aquaculture industry: Reshaping aquaculture production innovation networks. Marine Policy, 152(February 2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105624
Bakh, B., Zaharim, A., Sopian, K. Bin, Saadatian, O., & Electric, G. (2012). Affordable Quality Housing for Urban Low-Income Earners in Malaysia. Advances in Environmental Science and Sustainability, 120(December). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2184629
Batalli, M. (2011). Impact of Public Administration Innovations on Enhancing the Citizens’ Expectations. International Journal of e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.7763/ijeeee.2011.v1.25
Bird, R. M., & Slack, E. (2004). Fiscal Aspects of Metropolitan Governance, International Tax Program Paper 0401 (Nomor January 12). http://www.rotman.utoronto.ca/iib/
Bosworth, G., Rizzo, F., Marquardt, D., Strijker, D., Haartsen, T., & Aagaard Thuesen, A. (2016). Identifying social innovations in European local rural development initiatives. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 29(4), 440–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2016.1176555
Calderini, M., Fia, M., & Gerli, F. (2023). Organizing for transformative innovation policies: The role of social enterprises. Theoretical insights and evidence from Italy. Research Policy, 52(7), 104818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2023.104818
Chiu, R. L. H. (2010). The Transferability of Hong Kong’s Public Housing Policy. International Journal of Housing Policy, 10(3), 301–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616718.2010.506746
Choguill, C. L. (2008). Developing sustainable neighbourhoods. Habitat International, 32, 41–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2007.06.007
Clapham, D. (2018). Housing Theory, Housing Research, and Housing Policy. Housing, Theory and Society, 35(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2017.1366937
Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, J. V. (2000). The New Public Service: Serving Rather than Steering. Public Administration Review, 60(6), 549–559. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00117
Du, Y., & Guo, Q. (2023). Green credit policy and green innovation in green industries: Does climate policy uncertainty matter? Finance Research Letters, 58(PC), 104512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104512
Fopp, R. (2008). Social Constructionism and Housing Studies : A Critical Reflection. Urban Policy and Research, 26(2), 159–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111140801898548
Füg, F., & Ibert, O. (2020). Assembling social innovations in emergent professional communities. The case of learning region policies in Germany. European Planning Studies, 28(3), 541–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1639402
Ghosh, B., Kivimaa, P., Ramirez, M., Schot, J., & Torrens, J. (2021). Transformative outcomes: Assessing and reorienting experimentation with transformative innovation policy. Science and Public Policy, 48(5), 739–756. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scab045
Gilbert, A. (2004). Helping the poor through housing subsidies : lessons from Chile, Colombia and South Africa. Habitat International, 28, 13–40.
Glor, E. D. (2003). Applying Innovative Processes to Improve Governance and Public Administration and Reduce Poverty. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 12(2), 1–11.
Goebel, A. (2007). Sustainable Urban Development? Low-Cost Housing Challenges in South Africa. Habitat International, 31, 291–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2007.03.001
Governance Innovation Center Team. (2014). Handbook Inovasi Administrasi Negara (Vol. 1). Lembaga Administrasi Negara Republik Indonesia.
Law Number 1 of, Government of the Republic of Indonesia on Housing and Settlements Area (2011).
Law Number 9 of, Government of the Republic of Indonesia on Change of The Law Number 23 of 2014 (2015).
Griya Sejahtera. (2020a). Dikala Pandemi, Layanan PPDPP tetap “ SiKasep”. Buletin Griya Sejahtera Pusat Pengelolaan Dana Pembiayaan Perumahan, 5, 1–40.
Griya Sejahtera. (2020b). SiKasep Aplikasi Pintar bikin Penyaluran KPR FLPP Tepat Sasaran. Griya Sejahtera Pusat Pengelolaan Dana dan Pembiayaan Perumahan, 5, 1–40.
Gurran, N. (2003). Housing locally : positioning Australian local government housing for a new century. Urban Policy and Research, 21(4), 393–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/0811114032000147421
Habitat III Policy Papers. (2017). Housing Policies. In Economics. United Nations Conference on Housing and Sustainable Urban Development. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt183q4wb.30
He, S., Liu, J., & Ying, Q. (2023). Externalities of government-oriented support for innovation: Evidence from the national innovative city pilot policy in China. Economic Modelling, 128(29), 106503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2023.106503
Heo, Y. (2014). The Development of Housing Policy in Singapore and the Sources of Path Dependence. Housing, Theory and Society, 31(4), 429–446.
Jaiyeoba, B., & Aklanoglu, F. (2012). Socio- economic Issues in ‘Socially Produced’ Low Income Housing : Theory and Case study in Nigeria. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 50. AcE-Bs 2012 Bangkok ASEAN Conference on Environment-Behaviour Studies Bangkok Thailand, 50(July), 855–864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.087
Kingsley, G. T. (2017). Trends in Housing Problems and Federal Housing Assistance (Nomor October).
Lee, J. (2009). Developmentalism, social welfare and state capacity in East Asia : integrating housing and social security in Singapore. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 2(2), 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/17516230903027880
Mulgan, G., & Albury, D. (2003). Innovation In The Public Sector (Nomor October).
Navarro, F. M. (2016). From Government Innovation to Public Innovation. The ICT as Key Tools. International Journal of New Technology and Research (IJNTR), 2(6), 4–7.
Pawson, H., Miligan, V., & Martin, C. (2018). Building Australia’s Affordable Housing Industry: Capacity Challenges and Capacity-Enhancing Strategies. International Journal of Housing Policy, 1247(May). https://doi.org/10.1080/19491247.2018.1469108
Potts, J., & Kastelle, T. (2010). Public sector innovation research: What’s next? Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 12(2), 122–137.
Seo, J. K. (2016). Housing Policy and Urban Sustainable Development: Evaluating the Process of High-rise Apartment Development in Korea. Urban Policy and Research, 1146(April). https://doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2015.1118373
Sulaiman, F. C., Hasan, R., & Jamaluddin, E. R. (2016). Users Perception of Public Low Income Housing Management in Kuala Lumpur. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, AMER International Conference on Quality of Life, AicQoL, 234, 326–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.249
Tuckerman, L., Nelles, J., Walsh, K., & Vorley, T. (2023). Sustainable innovation policy: Examining the discourse of UK innovation policy. Environmental Science and Policy, 145(December 2022), 286–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2023.04.018
Tyran, J.-R., & Sausgruber, R. (2003). The Diffusion of Policy Innovations: An Experimental Investigation. In Discussion Paper No. 2003-14. www.fgn.unisg.ch/public/public.htm
UNDESA. (2006). Innovations in Governance and Public Administration: Replicating what works.
UNESCAP and UN Habitat, 2008. (2008). Perumahan bagi Kaum Miskin di kota-kota Asia, Perumahan untuk MBR: Memberi tempat yang layak bagi kaum miskin kota. United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP) Rajdamnern Nok Avenue Bangkok 10200, Thailand dan United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-HABITAT) P.O. Box 30030 GPO 00100 Nairobi, Kenya.
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case Study Research : design and methods (Fifth Edit). SAGE Publications Inc.
Copyright and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Bibliographic Information
-
Submitted
27 February 2024 -
Revised
28 February 2024 -
Accepted
Not available -
Published
31 March 2024