Jurnal Transformative
Full Lenght Article
Politik Perencanaan Pembangunan: Telaah Atas Pengarusutamaan Tata Ruang
Abstract
Pengarusutamaan tata ruang di Kota Makassar diperhadapkan oleh dua masalah utama, yakni minimnya peran perencanaan pembangunan dan proses politik yang tidak efektif. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk memahami lebih lanjut sejauh mana peran kedua hal tersebut dan kontribusinya terhadap pengarusutamaan tata ruang di Kota Makassar. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode analisis deskriptif. Hasil penelitian ini menemukan bahwa peran perencanaan pembangunan terhadap pengarusutamaan tata ruang, disebabkan oleh minimnya literasi dokumen perencanaan pembangunan baik dari sisi penyelenggara pemerintahan maupun bagi masyarakat, pelibatan masyarakat yang tidak partisipatif dalam perencanaan pembangunan, konsistensi pemerintah daerah Kota Makassar begitu rendah dalam mengawal program perencanaan pembangunan. Sementara, ditinjau dari proses politik, diakibatkan oleh kurangnya keberpihakan terhadap pengarusutamaan tata ruang dan penyalahgunaan kekuasaan. Implikasi dari penelitian ini, pentingnya pemerintah Kota Makassar melakukan peningkatan literasi dokumen perencanaan pembangunan berbasis pengarusutamaan tata ruang kepada masyarakat, perlunya mendorong perencanaan pembangunan dan proses politik yang lebih partisipatif, serta konsisten dalam mengawal program perencanaan pembangunan sehingga dapat meminimalisir penyalahgunaan kekuasaan dan menciptakan layanan publik dan tata kelola pemerintahan yang lebih baik dimasa-masa mendatang.
Keywords
Declarations
Publisher's Note
Faculty of Social and Political Science Universitas Brawijaya remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
Be-ere, S. (2023). Decentralization and Pro-poor Participation in Ghana: Unmasking the Barriers to Inclusive Grassroots Development. Studies in Comparative International Development, 58(2), 280–307.
Berisha, E., Cotella, G., Janin Rivolin, U., & Solly, A. (2021). Spatial governance and planning systems in the public control of spatial development: a European typology. European Planning Studies, 29(1), 181–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1726295
Blair, H. (2000). Participation and accountability at the periphery: Democratic local governance in six countries. World Development, 28(1), 21–39.
Botes, L., & Van Rensburg, D. (2000). Community participation in development: nine plagues and twelve commandments. Community Development Journal, 35(1), 41–58.
Cazorla-Montero, A., & De los Ríos-Carmenado, I. (2023). From “Putting the Last First” to “Working with People” in Rural Development Planning: A Bibliometric Analysis of 50 Years of Research. Sustainability, 15(13), 10117.
Chhotray, V. (2007). The ‘anti-politics machine’in India: depoliticisation through local institution building for participatory watershed development. The Journal of Development Studies, 43(6), 1037–1056.
Cobbinah, P. B., Asibey, M. O., Zuneidu, M. A., & Erdiaw-Kwasie, M. O. (2021). Accommodating green spaces in cities: Perceptions and attitudes in slums. Cities, 111, 103094.
Crosbie, T. (2021). Clausewitz and Military Politics: Theoretical Reflections on a Strong Program Approach to War and the Military. Militarization and the Global Rise of Paramilitary Culture: Post-Heroic Reimaginings of the Warrior, 17–36.
Ellerman, D. (2023). Fallacies about Corporations: Comments on “Democratizing the Corporation”. Politics & Society, 00323292231163689.
Fisher Melton, J. (2023). Democratization from below: Civil society in Tajikistan. Public Administration and Development, 43(1), 38–48.
Hakim, A., Domai, T., & Setyowati, E. (2021). Increased success of participatory development designing: the role of independent institution as moderation between community involvement and legislative institution responsiveness. International Journal of Law and Management, 63(1), 17–33.
Harrison, P., & Croese, S. (2023). The persistence and rise of master planning in urban Africa: transnational circuits and local ambitions. Planning Perspectives, 38(1), 25–47.
Hibbard, M., & Frank, K. I. (2023). TVA and the Grass Roots at 75: The Legacy of a Planning Classic. Journal of Planning Literature, 08854122231187573.
Ingrams, A. (2023). Do public comments make a difference in open rulemaking? Insights from information management using machine learning and QCA analysis. Government Information Quarterly, 40(1), 101778.
Kumah-Abiwu, F., Agbodzakey, J. K., & Darkwa, S. K. (2021). Historical perspectives of policymaking and administration in Africa. In Routledge handbook of public policy in Africa (pp. 191–201). Routledge.
Liu, Y., Nitanai, R., Manabe, R., & Murayama, A. (2023). Institutionalization of Transit-Oriented Development in Tokyo 1868–1945. Planning Perspectives, 1–28.
Maclure, L. (2023). Augmentations to the asset-based community development model to target power systems. Community Development, 54(1), 4–17.
Makhaev, M., Dadaev, K., Shamsuev, M., Idilov, S., Mazhiev, K., & Arsanukaev, A. (2023). EQGP concept: Principles and models of expert quality control of the government policy. SHS Web of Conferences, 164.
Mansuri, G., & Rao, V. (2012). Localizing development: Does participation work?
Mayfield, A., White, C. C., Downs, T., & Erlandson, D. (2022). Expanding advocacy for community college success. New Directions for Community Colleges, 2022(197), 13–28.
Mohan, G., & Stokke, K. (2000). Participatory development and empowerment: the dangers of localism. Third World Quarterly, 21(2), 247–268.
Mustafa, G., Yaseen, Z., Arslan, M., & Imran, M. (2021). Theoretical approaches to study the public policy: an analysis of the cyclic/stages heuristic model. PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 18(10), 1307–1321.
Nadin, V., Stead, D., Dąbrowski, M., & Fernandez-Maldonado, A. M. (2021). Integrated, adaptive and participatory spatial planning: trends across Europe. Regional Studies, 55(5), 791–803. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1817363
Petek, A., Baketa, N., Kekez, A., Kovačić, M., Munta, M., Petković, K., Šinko, M., & Zgurić, B. (2021). Unboxing the vague notion of policy goals: Comparison of Croatian public policies. European Policy Analysis, 7(2), 451–469.
Rivera, J. D., & Knox, C. C. (2023). Bureaucratic discretion, social equity, and the administrative legitimacy dilemma: Complications of New Public Service. Public Administration Review, 83(1), 65–77.
Siangulube, F. S., Ros-Tonen, M. A. F., Reed, J., Djoudi, H., Gumbo, D., & Sunderland, T. (2023). Navigating power imbalances in landscape governance: A network and influence analysis in southern Zambia. Regional Environmental Change, 23(1), 41.
Tancic, D., Tancic, P., & Tancic, L. (2021). Problems of Scientific Definitions of Document (Content) Analysis in Social Sciences. No. 31 Int’l J. Econ. & L., 10, 251.
Tosun, C. (2000). Limits to community participation in the tourism development process in developing countries. Tourism Management, 21(6), 613–633.
Wang, Z., & Guo, S. (2022). Politics of poverty governance: an introduction. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 27(2), 205–219.
Weible, C. M., Cairney, P., & Yordy, J. (2022). A diamond in the rough: digging up and polishing Harold D. Lasswell’s decision functions. Policy Sciences, 55(1), 209–222.
Yan, J., Huang, Y., Tan, S., Lang, W., & Chen, T. (2023). Jointly Creating Sustainable Rural Communities through Participatory Planning: A Case Study of Fengqing County, China. Land, 12(1), 187.
Copyright and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Bibliographic Information
-
Submitted
16 August 2023 -
Revised
17 August 2023 -
Accepted
Not available -
Published
29 September 2023